The creation of new types of websites such as flickr, google, wikipedia and media uses such as blogging are all examples of this. Websites now deliver an open infinitely flexible structure and it is clear that this is what the new media savvy generation want. In the future, what we receive and what we watch will be determined by us, not by some Hollywood producer or some BBC programme executive. This will be demand led communication, where the choice is so vast it can be personalised for your individual needs.
Innovation now has low entry barriers, fast development cycles and is driven by users not just research companies. Here the users are the designers, and innovation is a social and collaborative process. We are moving from periodic delivery through book, programme or panel to perpetual evolution. We have moved from what has been called Fire and Forget communication to direct flexible programming.
We are no longer in the publishing paradigm, where something is produced and then provided at a fixed point in time. This has huge implications for interpretation, the heritage sector and the ‘keepers of the knowledge’. As the monasteries kept control of the production of books, as this meant power, so we are perhaps also seeing a shift in who are the ‘keepers of the knowledge’. In the era when Wikipedia is more up-to-date than the Encyclopaedia Britannica, where even Museums curate collections online……. where will it end? How do we as a profession within the heritage sector move from what has been essentially a Victorian paradigm of ‘the expert’ communicating with the amateur to one of the audience determining the content? |